Faith | Freedom | Family

NO HIDING: Finding Faith & Freedom to walk out an authentic relationship with God, His Family, and His Word. Through: Biblical Studies | Stories | Scholarship

Search This Blog

Saturday, January 25, 2025

Your Question: What is your take on Original Sin or the state of sinfulness of human beings?

My answer in a class discussion post

Question: What is your take on Original Sin or the state of sinfulness of human beings? 

My Thoughts: The idea of "Original Sin" is totally foreign to the biblical authors worldview, up to and including Paul. 

Some rabbis, thinking Augustine got Paul right, have argued that Paul twisted Torah to say there was such an idea.[1] However, Stewart makes a decent case for defending that while the idea is completely foreign to the Hebrew Bible, it was developed in Second Temple Judaism.[2]

This begs way too many questions for a discussion post, I will try to be brief (not my strong suite, ha ha).

 

What is the biblical original of evil?

Heiser has made the case in his books and podcasts that the biblical authors would not describe the original of evil as a single event between God and Adam in Genesis three.[3] Rather, Genesis 1-11 operates as the prologue of Torah and Tanakh (and therefore the B’rit Chadashah/ New Testament).

In this prologue, there are various portraits and narratives that culminate in three major rebellions (and several minor ones). In all three archetype rebellions, there are Human and Elohim rebels present.

In all three narrative archetypes, "death" is shown as exile. Exile = Death. Physical death in later authors becomes the ultimate exile. 

  1. The Nachash (serpent) is a word that calls on divine origins, not simply a talking snake. Original readers would not simply see a snake, but a divine throne guardian operating in a serpent like manner. It is the partnership of Human (adam), Life (eve), and HaNachash (diviner or communicator for God, Shiny One, Serpent)[4] that leads to the exile of Human from the garden (human/divine joint space).
  2. The sin of the Watchers - The elohim intermingle with humankind and create hybrid offspring. They are also depicted as teaching humankind to war and kill. The story of the hybrid Nephilim is a callback to various Mesopotamian and Babylonian mythologies of the Apkallus. Long story there, but many Hebrew Bible texts make more sense once we have that history in our brains.
  3. The Rebellion at Babylon – For some reason, various English interpreters insist on translating Gen 11 as Babel, but it is the same Hebrew word for Babylon elsewhere, and that is intentional. This is a call back to Babylon’s history including the Apkallus from #2. Babylon considered themselves to have been founded by demigods who were mighty kings and warriors. The Tower of Babel isn’t just a tower, it’s a Ziggurat (worship temple) intended to bring the elohim (gods) and humankind together. This is a rejection of Yahweh. Thus, he divorces the nations, turns them over to the rebel elohim, and starts over with Abraham (See also Psalm 82, Psalm 89, etc.).

Genesis 12 is where the story really starts after this prologue. All human evil, throughout the biblical authors, including Paul, is brought back to the elohim + humankind tendency toward rebellion, and culturally toward using empire to break human relationships. It is the human tendency to partner with or be deceived by these rebel elohim that leads to so much evil. This is seen individually but also at a macro level by comparing God's rule and reign in contrast to "empire" where Babylon and Egypt become archetypes of human + elohim evil inflicted on other humans.

Sin is humans inspired by evil spirits in rebellion against God’s ways, resulting in broken relationship with God and fellow humans. Jesus defeats the rebel "powers" and The Church begins the mission of calling the divorced nations back to Yahweh, and taking dominion back from the rebel elohim's nations.

 

What is sin and what is Paul talking about?

Paul is working through why there is no distinction between different humans in regards to Jesus’ redemption, and he says, “For there is no distinction, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified as a gift…” (Rom 3:22-23). Thus, Paul’s statement is about there being no distinction between Jew and Gentile, because all have fallen short. Indeed, throughout the Hebrew Bible (Paul’s Scriptures), we see instance after instance of humankind being given the chance to rise up and failing in their relationship with God and/or their fellow human imagers. Paul goes on to expand on this by discussing the history of Abram (Abraham) and how he was considered to have faith and be loyal to Yahweh long before he received circumcision or any outward signs of covenant. Again, this is a Jew vs Gentile discussion.

It’s important to note that Paul says, “until the law, sin was in the world but sin is not charged to one’s account” – So he is not saying that people are guilty before an arbitrary set of sky rules, which is how many Christian traditions have ended up talking about “sin”. This reminds me of the US-American context of the 20th century, where it was a “sin” to wear makeup, go to the movies, smoke a cigarette, or other behaviors the community deemed untoward but have no biblical prohibition. Sin is often referred to as though it were about arbitrary behavior modification; rather, than about right-relationships, which is the biblical concern.

Following the Hebrew Bible authors use of words like sin, death, and exile interchangeably, Paul draws on the example of Human (adam) showing that death entered the world through one man and therefore one man can solve the problem.

What death? The death of exile from God’s presence. What is the answer then? God-With-Us, Emmanuel, came down in human form and restored us to right relationship with God and each other.

The entire argument is messier and muddier and more full of analogies than clean systems of theology are capable of nuancing. The ancient Israelite authors of the Hebrew Bible (and thus the Jewish authors of the New Testament) worked primarily through euphemism, analogy, metaphor, poetic license, hyperbole, and other literary devices to pain multiple portraits of the human condition from multiple angles.

  • The biblical narrative is not about Perfection > Fall > Redemption. That’s a foreign concept to the biblical authors’ worldview.
  • The biblical narrative is about Seed > Failure to Thrive/Grow into the Desired Outcome > Continued Progress Toward the Outcome (Hebrew Bible) > Renewed Covenant and Re-Empowered Re-Invigorated Mission aka New Creation / New Life (New Test) > And someday, on The Day of the Lord, a final and firm redemption and renewal in New Creation.

The narrative isn't about a fall, but a seed, failure, and progressive work on that seed.

The narrative is that God started a project to join God’s space with Human space, all humans fail in the process of that relationship, and God is continuing to work to see that initial seed of an idea come to fruition.

There was no fall or “original sin”, because there was no perfection to fall from. There was a seed, Human (adam) failed to finish the project, and all humans since have lived with that failure (narratively). God worked and continues to work on this human + God project, and he has initiated a new higher phase in Jesus, and he has an ultimate phase coming on The Day.

Side Note: When "original sin" is thrown out as an idea imposed on the text, other debates about Genesis start to mean less. I see no reason to understand Genesis 1-11 as anything but a metaphor and analogy of the human condition, and when Paul or Jesus draw Human (adam) into the discussion, they are calling on the literary figure, not a literal one. It’s not unlike me saying, “Just like Iron Man pulled one over on Thanos, Jesus pulled one over on the rebel elohim.” I’m drawing an analogy from a literary/media figure to make a point about a real one.



[1] Tovia Singer, “Does Judaism Believe in Original Sin? - Outreach Judaism,” 28 April 2014, https://outreachjudaism.org/original-sin/.

[2] Tyler Allen Stewart, “‘The Present Evil Age’: The Origin and Persistence of Evil in Galatians” (Marquette University, April 2019), Argument picks up around page 75., Dissertations (1934 -) - 830, Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects, https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/830/.

[3] Heiser, The Unseen Realm; Michael Heiser, Angels: What the Bible Really Says about God’s Heavenly Host, 2018, https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1900613; Michael Heiser, Demons: What the Bible Really Says about the Powers of Darkness (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2020); Michael Heiser, “The Naked Bible Podcast,” The Naked Bible Podcast, n.d., https://nakedbiblepodcast.com/episodes/.

[4] Heiser, The Unseen Realm, §Chapter 11-Section: The Nachash of Genesis 3.



Shalom שָׁלוֹם: Live Long and Prosper!
Darrell Wolfe
Storyteller | Writer | Thinker | Consultant | Freelancer | Bible Nerd *Written withs some editing and research assistance from ChatGPT-4o


My opening thoughts... I have no idea how I will use Buy Me A Coffee

My opening thoughts... I have no idea how I will use Buy Me A Coffee

In General, I know what marketing people do with tools like "Buy Me A Coffee" and Patreon and others. They create a false sense of scarcity and urgency by limiting certain content to certain people who can pay for the upgrades stuff.

The very thought of doing something like that makes me want to die inside. I would rather have a universe where all our needs our met, nobody has too much or too little, and we just do what we love and our motivation is to enjoy sharing what we love with our kindred spirits.

I also come from a unique eccentric mix of Judeo-Christian traditions, which have caused me to deconstruct the US-American Churchianity of my upbringing and seek out The Way of Rabbi Yeshua (who is way more interesting than my Church told me he was). As a result, my ethic is to share freely, widely, and openly. However, if I'm working so many hours to keep lights and food on that I can't write, I have nothing to share.

So here is my opening thought about starting this Buy Me Coffee channel....

Support My Work: If you want to support my work so I can keep doing more, buy my work on Amazon/Kindle/Audible (when it becomes available there, there is nothing there today, 01/25/2025), or Buy Me A Coffee.

My goal: Subject to change, you will never have to pay me anything to have access to my content outside of Amazon's ecosystem. So if you want to support me outside that system, Buy Me A Coffee.

Writing - Where you can find me

I write blogs, fiction, and academic articles. I will post those on the various channels for which they are appropriate.

  • Blog - www.DarrellWolfe.com - My most random thoughts of the moment.

  • Blog - www.NoHiding.Faith - All my biblical studies writing goes here.

  • Fiction -

Community - Discord

Storytellers - https://discord.gg/6UK5Txeq

I just started a discord server where we can start to build whatever we want there. Maybe separate channels for fiction, biblical studies, exvangelicals, etc. I dont' know, let's figure it out together.

What else should I be considering? I anticipate nobody will actually read this post, or it will be years from now. But I wanted to put it out into the ether and let it marinate while I work on a complete re-write of my first novel for the fourth time, but this time with new tools and a reasonable expectation of putting something out worth reading. We shall see.

Darrell Wolfe, Storyteller



Shalom שָׁלוֹם: Live Long and Prosper!
Darrell Wolfe
Storyteller | Writer | Thinker | Consultant | Freelancer | Bible Nerd *Written withs some editing and research assistance from ChatGPT-4o


Saturday, January 11, 2025

How can I be a "Good Christian" in the 21st century?

Cross posting from another conversation thread... 

To your question, "...should it be easy to be a good Christian?" I posit a thought to add to your musing. 

I've spent the last five years studying the Ancient Near East and Second Temple Judaism contexts of the biblical authors. One of the fascinating shifts was away from a Jewish mentality of focusing on "Orthopraxy" (right practice) to a Gentile mentality of focusing on "Orthodoxy" (right belief). It is my thesis at this point in my journey that this shift fundamentally broke the Gentile western Church. From the very beginning, we took a wrong turn by doing this.

I find it interesting that so many of us who grew up in modern western Churchianity find ourselves asking what we need to "do" to be a "good Christian"? 

That was the question Jewish believers were asking themselves in the first century AD. Go read the gospels and stop thinking of the Pharisees as Jesus' adversaries and instead see them as his peers (not an inter faith debate, but an intra faith debate). This was inside baseball, this was rabbi to rabbi... Jesus was recognized as a Rabbi by the Pharisees. This wasn't a Jesus against the Jewish Rabbis debate they were having, this is Jewish Rabbi Jesus saying, "This is how you be a Torah observant Jew" and the other Jewish Rabbis saying, "But what about this practice? What about what Rabbi Shammai? What about Rabbi Hillel? Why should be "Good Jews" your way?" 

When the Gentiles first came to The Way of Rabbi Yeshua, they didn't ask what doctrines they should believe to be part of the family. They asked "what should they be required to DO?" Abstain from blood, don't eat meat.... etc." 

They were asking how Gentiles can come to a Jewish sect without becoming fully Torah observant Jews. In other words, the entire New Testament exists to answer "How can I be a Good Christian?" not to answer "What Doctrines should I believe?" 

It was about practice, not doctrines.

While I cannot do much to change anyone else's mind about that, I find myself in 2025 looking not to what churches have the right doctrinal statements, but rather, HOW they live. If a person or group claims to be a follower of Jesus, I look to see if they are

  • feeding the hungry,
  • giving water to the thirsty,
  • welcoming and providing hospitality to the stranger/traveler/immigrant,
  • working with the Sick to bring healing or relieve pain,
  • vising those in prison.... (Matthew 25).

If they're doing that kind of stuff, or stuff in that general direction... they're a "Good Christian" and if they aren't they're not (regardless of they claim to hold on their "We Believe" pages on their website). 

I might get more nuanced in the future, but that's where I'm sitting with that question today. 



Shalom שָׁלוֹם: Live Long and Prosper!
Darrell Wolfe
Storyteller | Writer | Thinker | Consultant | Freelancer | Bible Nerd *Written withs some editing and research assistance from ChatGPT-4o